Social Media Pages Under The Pressure Of Preparation For The Census, Trolls And Disorders

Social Media pages Under the pressure of preparation For the census, trolls, And interference

Enlarge this image

The legislators and civil rights groups are urging tech companies to come through with detailed guidelines on how to counter any misinformation and disinformation about the census in 2020.

Denis Charlet/AFP via Getty Images

hide caption


Denis Charlet/AFP via Getty Images

The first U.S. census that all households to participate online in front of an unprecedented challenge — the danger of misinformation through social media.

in the year 2020 draws closer Federal officials fear foreign governments and Internet trolls could use spread Facebook, Twitter and other platforms to derail rumors and propaganda, the constitutional officer will count with a minimum of 10 years in the value of impact on the elections throughout the country.

results from the head-count of every person that will uses the life in the USA, only the distribution of congressional seats and Electoral College votes among the States, but to also draw new state and local voting districts beginning in the year 2021.

“This is a new era. The last ten-year census, not really facing this type of challenge,” Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham recognized in April during a U.S. Senate hearing, where Sen. Jack Reed, Dr. I., pressed for answers, as the Bureau prepares to interfere with the fight against the disinformation campaigns and other online trying to get the count.

“We are working with Facebook. We are working with Twitter. We work with Microsoft,” says Dillingham, who said the office is also in consultation with the Department of Homeland Security, and intelligence services, in order to determine possible sources of interference to the census in 2020.

print “do more and to do better

lawmakers and civil rights groups”have not been ratcheting overlooked until the pressure on the tech companies to the census, as you roll-out strategies for dealing with the potential onslaught of disinformation about the 2020 election. Last week, Twitter announced that it is the political ads later this month.

“We believe that social media-wrote platforms need to do more and do better, as has been done in 2016 to prevent and to reduce problems in our next count”, of the 57 house Democrats, led by Rep. Bill Pascrell of New Jersey, in a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, which was Monday.

This week, the members of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus-a plan to send a letter to Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, to ask, a briefing on the company census plans, according to the press office of Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif.

“We are deeply concerned that the [Asian American and Pacific Islander] community, which are already vulnerable to under-counted, prone to misinformation and scare tactic of evil players that want to undermine our democracy,” write the lawmakers in the design together with NPR.

Facebook, in particular, under fire recently for its decision not to block, or fact-check what politicians say, the on its platform. During a U.S. house hearing last month, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that Facebook believes that “in a democracy, it is important that the people can see for themselves what the politicians say.”

published In an open letter to Zuckerberg on Tuesday, however, the head of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Kristen Clarke, pushed back on this argument.

“We have to allow that the decision to disable false statements of the politicians know voters and census campaigns of disinformation increases, and increase to suspend the activity to harm African Americans and other people of color”, as Clarke wrote.

developed The waiting for features

With just over four months, until the number of heads is in full swing, members of Congress and other census advocates are still waiting for some tech company to release policy, specifically to combat the census of disinformation.

Zuckerberg appeared to be listening to balmy during the house, when Rep. tried to Vicente Gonzalez, D-Texas, to measure the limits of Facebook policy.

Federal law prohibits the release of the census data is the detection of people up to 72 years after it is collected. But Gonzalez hypothetically asked if Facebook would you take a message, the incorrectly referred to information immigrants, the participation in the census would be shared with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“Okay. So, Congressman, where we are right now, we have a voter-suppression policy,” Zuckerberg answered, “and we are working to completion, to extend the that a census policy of oppression.”

“That is not the voter suppression,” Gonzalez countered.

“I agree. I’m sorry. I’m trying to answer your question,” Zuckerberg said, before adding that he expects more details about the company census announced plans “in the coming weeks.”

“proof in the pudding”

sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, has been pushing tech company for months, spell out your plans. In letters to the heads of Facebook, Twitter, Google + and Reddit in July, honey, the companies “clear and specific” policy on Oct. 31.

In their answers to the treasure, the details were put together by Reddit and Twitter (the updated Directive is classified by the U.S. census as a “social event”), while Google and Facebook deferred to an unspecified date.

“I think it’s fair to say that some of them are more advanced than others in terms of the development of the policy,” treasure NPR.

The senator noted, to say that for now, tech companies are “the right things up.”

“But the proof is in the pudding over the next couple of months to see if they actually do it to,” treasure added.

Google spokesman Nu Wexler did not answer you, NPR question, if the company is planning the release of its policy. But in a written statement, Wexler said, “Google and YouTube are committed to protect against the misinformation and fraudulent activities, the integrity of the 2020 Census.”

The danger of “invalid data”

Civil rights organizations are particularly concerned about the possible impact of the census, rumors, and propaganda on communities of color, and immigrant groups, the forms of no confidence in the authorities, especially after the more than year-long legal dispute over the citizenship of the matter of trump-management error while adding the 2020 census.

“this fear can be really exacerbated, and exploited, if inaccurate information is in these communities,” said Vanita Gupta, President and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and a former justice Department official during the Obama administration.

Some of the misinformation, researchers have highlighted the relative lack of results when you search for online content related to the census. It is what the researchers at Microsoft call a “data sets to use is invalid” ready for Internet trolls.

“If it’s misinformation or disinformation, you can fill the void of information,” Gupta said.

fiction spreads faster than the truth

The polarized rhetoric drummed out of the citizenship question, the debate on the census, in a “weak” area of the US society to be malicious actors, according to young Mie Kim, professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, conducted a study of Facebook ads released in the run-up to the elections of 2016.

Kim said, another potential challenge is the dissemination of misinformation or disinformation about the census, U.S. politicians, the social media platforms may not want to cross, for fear of a party to appear Japanese.

“don’t want you to come up with a political situation,” Kim said. “There is no incentive for the tech to do platforms.”

Regardless of where the disinformation comes in, an important factor in the fight will be, how quickly a social media platform can be active, explains Dipayan Ghosh, a former adviser to Facebook on privacy and public policy.

Facebook, for example, “has to develop, to understand, a hugely sophisticated artificial intelligence, the content and take it down in a timely manner and be brave to take it down in a timely manner, even if it knows that it could be against the freedom of political expression,” said Ghosh, who now co-directs the Digital platforms, and democracy project at the Harvard Kennedy School shore stone Center.

In a study of the stories that are shared in Twitter, WITH the researchers found that untruths are more novel and new information is more likely to have retweeted.

“It is actually widely used by people, which said a faster-than-the truth,” Ghosh. “This is a worrying fact, considering that we want a fair census.”

Released on Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:07:09 +0000

Leave a Comment