iPhone-SE vs. Galaxy A51-camera-comparison: Is it a slam dunk for Samsung? – CNET

iPhone-SE vs. Galaxy A51-camera-comparison: Is it a slam dunk for Samsung? – CNET


Lexy Savvides/CNET

Samsung Galaxy A51 is $400 (£329, AU$599) power pack with four cameras, the flexibility for the photography, from the ultra-wide-angle to macro. But Apple ‘ s new iPhone-SE, despite having only a rear camera, smart-photography-features borrowed from more expensive models such as the iPhone 11. Here on everything from portraits and landscapes in the video recording is how to compare these two $400 phones.

more: iPhone-SE-2020 is the proof that Apple doesn’t really bring back the small phone


Now playing:
look at this:

iPhone or Galaxy A51: the battle of the $400 cell phone cameras



6:13

The Galaxy A51 has several cameras to choose from

Right off the bat, the galaxy has four rear cameras, a 48-megapixel main camera with f2, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle, 5-megapixel macro camera and a depth sensor The iPhone-SE has a single 12-megapixel rear camera f1.8.

sounds But while the variety is great on paper, but in practice, I found myself getting a lot of use from only two of the four. The depth camera, for example, is not really photography. It is only for the live-focus (or portrait mode) images.

img 3760

Lexy Savvides/CNET

in addition to the use of the camera, I found that the uw-camera on the Galaxy A51 handy as the macro-camera, and it was the most important thing I missed, if you are photos on the iPhone SE. This is because I was able to shoot a larger area to move without physically. Use the slider on the image below to see the difference in perspective, from the width of the uw-camera.

This is not to say that the A51 macro camera is a dud. For macro photos, it’s no contest: The Galaxy A51 can capture photos in a much narrower reach than the iPhone-SE, although you will need to much of light, to get the best out of this camera. I have had the best results when photographing plants outdoors on a bright, Sunny day, while all I tried to get inside turned into a blurry fuzzy mess. 

20200426-103205

One of my successful macro photos.


Lexy Savvides/CNET

Also, there is no optical image stabilization (OIS) on a Galaxy A51-cameras, in contrast to the iPhone-SE, which has OIS on the back of the camera.

Neither have mobile phones with optical zoom, so I relied on the digital zoom to get closer to objects — 5x on the SE and 8x on the A51. Both produce an acceptable shot at 5x, but the iPhone sees the image less over-sharpened and “crisp” than the A51.

Galaxy A51 clear photos compared to the iPhone-SE natural appearance

The Galaxy A51, a scene optimizer is enabled by default. The camera automatically detects the subject in the frame, such as food or landscMonkeys, improves the photo. It makes the colors pop off the screen, but to be oversaturated in some cases, especially with pictures of food or flowers, the scene optimizer makes images look for . The iPhone-SE creates a more natural shot I like more than the intense colors of the Galaxy-A51. Your personal preferences may differ from me.

Both the Galaxy A51 and iPhone have a HDR mode to help balance out shadow and highlight detail, and both phones have found a great job I have, it is difficult to separate HDR was the performance of another.

When I saw the photos at a reduced magnification on a computer screen, there was not much to separate the two on everything, except for the color saturation. But as I looked closer at the 100% crop, many photos I have on the regular Galaxy A51 camera looked less detailed than the corresponding iPhone-SE shot.

Portrait-and night-mode are closer than you think

Both the phones can help make your design pop blurs the background to have a similar effect to a photo on a DSLR camera on a wide aperture. 

The iPhone pulls out of this blur-or “bokeh” effect more, of course, particularly if you the effect on the top and want to blur the background as much as possible. But the Galaxy A51 has a better edge detection by the depth of the camera, so there was more definition between my subject and the background. In times, fine details such as hair, the iPhone-SE confused, so that some of these details got lost in the background Manager.

The iPhone-SE can only format portrait photos of people, while the Galaxy A51 works on any theme, including Pets. You just have to make sure that it remains to your animal friend still, while they made a recording.

Only the Galaxy A51 offers a special night mode for photos in low-light situations. This sounds great for the A51 on the surface, the is iPhone, SE in the situation, comparable to images without such a mode. The iPhone produces a usable night photo, as long as I kept my hand steady. But I needed to do the same for the A51 in the use of night-mode. 

The Galaxy A51 catches more sharpness, and preserves the highlight Details than the iPhone-SE in the night, but not much. There is also a smaller, 8-megapixel file when using night mode.

Selfies are more natural on the iPhone-SE

Although the Galaxy A51 front-facing camera offers more megapixels (32!), the iPhone produces photos with more natural colors. To be oversaturated to my eye, the Galaxy A51 of the red channel, so much so that my brown hair looked almost copper in some selfies. The A51 captured a sharper shot, overall, than the iPhone-SE 7-megapixel front-camera, but the iPhone’s colors and skin tone look more true-to-life.

For the video resolution, although the Galaxy A51 has the upper hand. It can  4K video from the front-facing camera, while the iPhone-SE maxes out at 1080p. You can

The iPhone-SE takes the edge video

I filmed the whole video we have on this page on both the iPhone and SE and Galaxy A51 and found that the iPhone cut is definitely better, overall. In good light the image looks cleaner with less noise than the Galaxy and OIS on the iPhone makes a big difference if you are recording a video. Clips I took handheld 4K super looked smooth on the iPhone-SE in comparison to the same resolution on the Galaxy A51, which has no OIS. You can

The iPhone can also film in 4K/60fps, while the A51 only film in 4K/30 Auto focus on the Galaxy A51 is not as smooth as it is on the iPhone-SE. For a lot of clips, especially when shooting a static subject, I had to lock the focus before shooting, to make things smooth. I noticed the auto focus wince when you’re shooting moving subjects on the Galaxy A51. On the iPhone, movements looked smoother and more cinematic.

“Audio” from both works, but the iPhone sounds full and round in comparison to the clips of the Galaxy, even though both phones record in stereo.

the iPhone or Galaxy A51 have the better camera?

these Two $400 phones enabled cameras, the Bely to the retail price. The Galaxy offers more flexibility, if you want to be able to switch between different scenarios, such as the use of ultra-wide-angle or macro. But the iPhone has more powerful video-recording and, in some cases, the camera captures more Details at full magnification. Regardless of which phone you choose, you get a lot of camera for your money, but I would personally choose the iPhone for its enhanced video-recording. I would pick Galaxy A51, if I wanted the flexibility of an ultra-wide angle lens.

Released on Thu, 07 May 2020 18:20:00 +0000

Leave a Comment